[Introduction ] [History] [The Industry] [Solutions] [Alternatives] ['Net Warez] [Food for Thought] [Sources]

Cynosure: Not a Sure Thing


6 Weeks of Fun

Most FTP sites containing pirated software last a few days and then the data moves on to some other cyberspace harbor of illegal uploading and downloading. But according to U.S. Attorney General reports, David LaMacchia's Cynosure and Cynosure II, located on MIT workstations, were connected to the Internet from November 21, 1993 to January 5, 1994, six weeks of active pirating. Even if the site's address was only passed on by word of mouth, with a site up that long it was only a matter of time before law enforcement would find out and intervene.

What He Did

Basically, all LaMacchia did was give Internet users access to MIT's Athena workstations. If one knows the machine's address and a correct login/password, he/she is then able to log onto the site and browse what is stored there. If you have ever logged into one of UT's public FTP servers, such as Microlib or simply ftp.utexas.edu, your access to the shareware/freeware programs stored there is pretty much the same type of access a net user will have had to Cynosure on the MIT machines. Again, there is one fundamental difference: Microlib knowingly stores free or low-cost programs while MIT's computers unknowingly stored unlicensed commercial programs.

What Happened

David LaMacchia was indicted April 7, 1994, for violating wire-fraud statutes, but the case was eventually thrown out. U.S. District Court Judge Richard Stearns, who threw out the case, said that "Mr. LaMacchia could not be prosecuted for criminal copyright infringement under the wire-fraud statute, in part because he had not profited personally from the scheme." (Wilson, A20) Current law declares distributing pirated software illegal even without a motive of profit, but the issue the legislators seemed to be pointing out was whether or not LaMacchia should be punished for simply making a site available for the copying of commercial programs. This issue of whether or not an information carrier or system operator should be responsible for the content that flows through their networks remains unresolved. Still, this incident is just another reason for the software industry to be concerned about the protection of their livelihood.


Other Links of Interest

David LaMacchia cleared; case raises civil liberties issues
Official Dismissal of Charges
Contributions to the David LaMacchia Legal Defense Fund

[Introduction ] [History] [The Industry] [Solutions] [Alternatives] ['Net Warez] [Food for Thought] [Sources]


Page Published March 31, 1996
Go: RTF/COM 309's Computer Security Website