Posted by Genève Gil on April 30, 1997 at 13:11:36:
In Reply to: Research paper - Women's Involvement in Zapatista Movement posted by Diane on April 30, 1997 at 09:25:12:
: Hello. I'm a student at Sonoma State University and doing some research for a paper on the above. After some reading, I still have some questions. Please respond asap...and if you have any additional information that would be helpful, I would really appreciate it! Thanks in advance.1. From my reading I've found that it is not that uncommon that both Mexican and indigenous women are involved in revolutionary movements. Is there something that makes Chiapas unique?2. I've read that the involvement of women is somewhere near 30%. What is that in terms of actual numbers, and are these women in support or combat roles, or a combination of both?3. Why is Marcos the only one who speaks for the EZLN? Why not a woman?4. Is this also a class struggle b etween Ladino and Mayan women, or is there support from Ladino women as well?
Dear Diane,
Some good questions here, not necessarily easy to answer...
I'm going to give a first stab at it and hope that pthers leap in
to stir it up a little more.<
br>1. "Revolutionary movements" is rather vague. It would
be helpful if you made a more direct comparison,
between the Zapatista movement and some other particular
historical movements -- the Mexican Revolution, Tlaltelolco,
Indigenous uprisi
ngs in Southern Mexico in the 1800s, rural Campesino
movements of the 80s, urban teachers' strikes -- each of these
examples of poltical action is unique and involves women in distinct ways.
In any case, Chiapas *is* different, but how? Let's see
how many different
answers we can come up with here.
For one, the Zapatista movement is not about taking power.
Most revolutionary movements are; some political organizations
are and some are not. There is something new here in the way in whi
ch
the indigenous woman has left her home, chosen not to marry, and volunteered
to tkae up arms and fight for something she believes in.The women
in the Zapatista Army are learning Spanish (if they don't know it),
bearing arms, and, in many ca
ses, givong orders to men -- who, serving
at their side, are charged with washing dishes and sweeping floors
as well as being militant.
So. How much can we really know of what goes on in the ranks of the
EZLN? Especially, of what the women th
ere are thinking,
feeling, experiencing?
I concieved of this space in part in hopes that those with any knowledge,
experience or insight might come here to share their views, stories,
photographs, hunches, intuitions and, when possible, knowl
edge.
2. The queston of how many Zapatistas are women is far from resolved.
How many out there have heard or read 50%? More? Another figure?
Well, again, how is anyone really to know. This seems a great space to raise the issues
of methodology,
resources and hard data. To say the least, the subject of Zapatista
women is new, is now, and is extremely elusive.
In any case, yes, women are Zapatistas in both military and
supportive roles. Some are in the Army, and live in the jungle with <
br>the other soldiers, and others have never left their communities
but act in sloidarity, in any number of ways. There are women in the Comandancia General
(as well as the individual community Comandancias) who play major
decision-making roles.<
p>I invite you all to challenge my assertions here, question my sources, raise alternatives--
let's make this a space of exploration and collaboraton. I am hoping others with
closer knowledge than I will chime in...
3. Hmmmm. Well, Marcos is not
the only one who speaks for the EZLN. There have been EZLN communiques
issued specifically by Zapatista women to women elsewhere, most often around March 8, International
Women's Day. And Comandante Ramona recently spoke in Mexico çity to a lorge a
udience. And Cecelia Rodriguez
of the National Commission for Democracy in Mexico and the United States is the official/appointed spokesperson
for the EZLN in the United Stated (of North America).
Yet, it is true that Marcos is the predominant spe
aker of the movement.
I'd be happy to speak more to this later. This reply is getting long and I'd like to hear what others mgith have to
contribute...
4. The Ladino issue is another complicated one. More later on this as well. But, yes, there ar
e most definitely
urban and rural Ladino women involved in Zapatismo -- both those with strong in indigenous heritages and those
of all or mostly European descent.
Okay, who's next? :)
Geneve